From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e009f0918a859dbe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-09 09:49:24 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!butch!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!l107353
From: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: DOD-STD-1679A(Navy)
Date: 9 Mar 1995 17:05:04 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Missiles and Space Co.
Message-ID: <3jncg0$7vu@butch.lmsc.lockheed.com>
References: <3jgic3$q3g$1@sydney.DIALix.oz.au>
 <3jkddt$mk1@michp1.redstone.army.mil>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: 1995-03-09T17:05:04+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Doc Elliott (helliott@losat.redstone.army.mil) wrote:
: ?!?!?!?!  The Navy actually will accept a CSCI that has KNOWN problems?
: And yet they still get more of the DoD budget than we do.....

To be fair, I think all U.S. military services have a waiver and deviation
process that permits accepting CSCIs with known problems.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Garlington                  GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com
F-22 Computer Resources         Lockheed Fort Worth Co.

If LFWC or the F-22 program has any opinions, they aren't telling me.