From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c71453a1d79f18ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-10 03:50:13 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail
From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada compiler for os/2
Date: 9 Mar 1995 07:23:16 -0600
Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services   +1 713 968 5800
Message-ID: <3jmvg4$4ik@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
References: <3jj8cqINNoho@edna.cc.swin.edu.au>
 <3jjcpc$7j@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <3jlu96INN24f@edna.cc.swin.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com
Date: 1995-03-09T07:23:16-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3jlu96INN24f@edna.cc.swin.edu.au>,
Paul Shin-Hou Yeoh <930385@edna.cc.swin.edu.au> wrote:
>is Gnat Ada and Gnu Ada validated Ada compilers?
>They would be pretty useless if they are not.
>

I claim you are horribly wrong.  Defend your statement.


-- 
      Frustrated with C, C++, Pascal, Fortran?  Ada95 _might_ be for you!
	  For all sorts of interesting Ada95 tidbits, run the command:
"finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.)