From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f5fb7dd4dd04726a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-09 07:33:43 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!butch!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!l107353
From: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada 95 docs: Rationale
Date: 8 Mar 1995 18:21:13 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Missiles and Space Co.
Message-ID: <3jksip$meg@butch.lmsc.lockheed.com>
References: <3jkqh8$cr@solar.Armstrong.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: 1995-03-08T18:21:13+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

ab@captblood.armstrong.edu wrote:
: Did any of you attempt to print the PostScript version of the Ada 95
: Rationale taken either from the Ada Information Clearing House host
: or as distributed with Gnat-2.03 by NYU?

: I tried to print them a number of times, each time unsuccessfully.

I was also unable to print them on a DEC laser printer. Unlike the other
Ada 95 documents, the Rationale was developed using something other than
FrameMaker, and so the PostScript version is different.

I tried to get it fixed, to no avail. The text version is OK, though.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Garlington                  GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com
F-22 Computer Resources         Lockheed Fort Worth Co.

If LFWC or the F-22 program has any opinions, they aren't telling me.