From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cd24ffa36ebe3ef6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-06 17:00:31 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!ionews.ionet.net!news From: kkrieser@ionet.net Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: debugging GNAT programs Date: 6 Mar 1995 00:38:55 GMT Organization: Internet Oklahoma Message-ID: <3jdliv$bj7@ionews.ionet.net> References: <1995Mar2.095243.14051@sei.cmu.edu> <3j85fv$31s@newssvr.cacd.rockwell.com> <3jcmo9$skq@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> Reply-To: kkrieser@ionet.net NNTP-Posting-Host: lsip02.ionet.net X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.09 Date: 1995-03-06T00:38:55+00:00 List-Id: In <3jcmo9$skq@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: >"This step could eventually be skipped IMHO" >(along >with an extensive philosophical discussion in which others felt that generating >the main program in C somehow declared that C was a superior language to >Ada -- not quite sure I ever managed to follow that logic, but anyway we >do intend to "fix" this "problem". Of course, by that light, machine code is declared as a superior lanquage, since most languages, unless interpreted or P-code, are converted into machine code ----------------------------------------- -- Kevin Krieser -- Using OS/2 Warp -- New Address: kkrieser@ionet.net, -- or kkrieser@bix.com