From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9fd05e2c23c9c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-03 11:13:11 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!gatech!udel!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!admii!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Comparison and Communication between C++ and ADA
Date: 3 Mar 1995 14:13:11 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3j7po7$k4b@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <9503020944.AA15308@MAS>
NNTP-Posting-Host: schonberg.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-03-03T14:13:11-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In answer to Olivier's question about C++ toolboxes and Ada, there is
an interface facility in GNAT that allows direct interface between Ada
and existing C++ class libraries. So if you are using GNAT, the fact that
you have existing interfaces in C++ should not stand in the way of adopting
Ada ...