From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,55c3d66a7778a37e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-28 06:41:51 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!rutgers!sgigate.sgi.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!admii!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: '9X or '95 ?
Date: 28 Feb 1995 09:41:51 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3ivcng$o9g@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <gauthier-2702951122590001@164.81.60.62>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-02-28T09:41:51-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Regarding Ada 9X, some time ago I edited the GNAT sources to remove
all references to Ada 9X, and replace with Ada 95.

I even changed the name of the pragma Ada_9X to Ada_95 (this pragma is used
to ensure that a unit is compiled in Ada 95 mode, even if it is with'ed by
a unit being compiled in Ada 83 mode).

P.S. there are a number of neat pragmas and attributes in GNAT, for a 
complete list see the source files of sem_prag and sem_attr. One of these
days we will complete the full documentation!