From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c3220a01ba6c6485,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: fc544,c3220a01ba6c6485,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfc544,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-26 17:49:44 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!stern.fokus.gmd.de!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!zib-berlin.de!news.mathworks.com!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!gatech!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.graphics.opengl Subject: Re: OpenGL bindings for Ada Date: 26 Feb 1995 19:49:44 -0600 Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services +1 713 968 5800 Message-ID: <3irb3o$sse@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> References: <3ir5g2$5am@adm09.iac.honeywell.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com Xref: nntp.gmd.de comp.lang.ada:19217 comp.graphics.opengl:3550 Date: 1995-02-26T19:49:44-06:00 List-Id: In article <3ir5g2$5am@adm09.iac.honeywell.com>, Chip Richards wrote: >What I really want is GNAT bindings for Mesa. Failing that, I'll take GNAT >bindings for licensed OpenGL. Next on the list would be any Ada 95 bindings >for Mesa, or OpenGL. Finally, I suppose even Ada 83 bindings for OpenGL would SGI fully supports Ada95 and has already got a set of OpenGL bindings for Ada95 (as well as GL, Performer, etc.). I have no idea what their terms and conditions are on distribution of those bindings. Anybody from SGI care to comment? Dave McAllister? Wes Embry? -- Frustrated with C, C++, Pascal, Fortran? Ada95 _might_ be for you! For all sorts of interesting Ada95 tidbits, run the command: "finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.)