From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca04d005e518ddf1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-24 20:17:48 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!stern.fokus.gmd.de!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!zib-berlin.de!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!admii!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Wanted: Well written Ada FFT Date: 24 Feb 1995 23:17:48 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3imb1c$4h5@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <3i96d4$e9m@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3ib07m$17ae@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1995-02-24T23:17:48-05:00 List-Id: "|> I picked up "ada_fft" off ftp.cdrom.com but wasn't impressed. (The |> spec with'd and use'd three packages.)" I guess some people are pretty desparate for simple ways of juding whether software is good or bad (it's easy, just count the number of uses :-)