From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4961da398a273222
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-11 05:56:04 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!hudson.lm.com!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!zip.eecs.umich.edu!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada self-referential operators
Date: 11 Feb 1995 08:56:04 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3hiflk$bbp@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <3gnkjb$gso@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com> <3grqrf$jkd@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
 <D3LJ9o.K3H@nntpa.cb.att.com> <D3nsJJ.6qz@swlvx2.msd.ray.com>
 <3hdjf2$12km@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-02-11T08:56:04-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Maybe we can decide that the business of < generating other operators
automatically is merely a source representation issue? :-)