From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4961da398a273222 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-07 23:17:12 PST Path: swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!news.claremont.edu!paris.ics.uci.edu!delphi.cs.ucla.edu!not-for-mail From: jmartin@oahu.cs.ucla.edu (Jay Martin) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada self-referential operators Date: 7 Feb 1995 22:45:53 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Dept. Message-ID: <3h9pb1$kcr@oahu.cs.ucla.edu> References: <3gnkjb$gso@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com> <3grqrf$jkd@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: oahu.cs.ucla.edu X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0.b3.0 #8 (NOV) Date: 1995-02-07T22:45:53-08:00 List-Id: Brilliantly said (John Volan)! This gets saved in my language design directory. >cryptic "mathematicalese" More like crypitic PSEUDO "mathematicalese" since we don't want to give it any mathematical validity because it has none. Its sickening how C has brain-damaged so many programmers out there. "Where's my increment operators? I got to have my increment operators! Convenience Or Death!". Conjecture: (Software Engineering /= Programming Convenience) Well maybe they are smart. Every time you add a crazy operator, idiom, unchecked or bizarre syntactic feature, you make it harder for outsiders to program the language. This makes the experts in the language more valuable, thus they get more $$$ and power! It also gives them that a feeling of superiority because only programmers in their elite club are "brilliant" enough to understand their sacred code! Jay