From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,19812cdb56d31fbd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-07 20:46:43 PST Path: swrinde!gatech!udel!news.mathworks.com!newshost.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!caen!msunews!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!aggedor.rmit.EDU.AU!goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au!not-for-mail From: ok@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 9X Doc v5.99 Date: 8 Feb 1995 15:26:18 +1100 Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia Message-ID: <3h9h5a$2el@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> References: <3gbs98$47f@network.ucsd.edu> <3gdhj5$1gbk@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <3gj91d$10g2@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <3gmv5r$mba@felix.seas.gwu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au NNTP-Posting-User: ok Date: 1995-02-08T15:26:18+11:00 List-Id: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) writes: >Those are _really_ English units. Robert, do the English ever still >(informally) express their body weight in stones? Can't speak for the British, but I was in hospital here in Melbourne last month and the scales provided for the use of patients were calibrated both in kilos and in stones. The stone is actually a very good unit of measurement for human beings; an adult woman is typically about 10 stone, so it's easy to comprehend how big a stone is and not too hard to make a good estimate of a weight to the nearest stone. -- "The complex-type shall be a simple-type." ISO 10206:1991 (Extended Pascal) Richard A. O'Keefe; http://www.cs.rmit.edu.au/~ok; RMIT Comp.Sci.