From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c86cf2332cbe682 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-09 13:37:50 PST Path: swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!watnews.watson.ibm.com!ncohen From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems? Date: 7 Feb 1995 20:22:51 GMT Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center Distribution: world Message-ID: <3h8kqr$led@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> References: <1995Feb1.154623.5483@sei.cmu.edu> <3gr5b4$1eq2@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> Reply-To: ncohen@watson.ibm.com NNTP-Posting-Host: rios8.watson.ibm.com Date: 1995-02-07T20:22:51+00:00 List-Id: In article , stt@henning.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) writes: |> One other nice feature -- we get rid of the oxymoronic term |> "passive task" ;-). (I know ... "oxymoron" is supposed to |> be used for "poetic" juxtapositions only...). But to make up for it, Ada 95 introduces a child of package Ada.Numerics named Complex_Elementary_Functions. ;-) -- Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com