From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd24e54f7983a2f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-07 03:25:25 PST Path: swrinde!sgiblab!uhog.mit.edu!news.mathworks.com!panix!cmcl2!lab.ultra.nyu.edu!kenner From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: FSF drops Apple boycott, opens gate for GNAT, etc. Date: 7 Feb 1995 10:49:05 GMT Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab Message-ID: <3h7j71$psu@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> References: <9502031233.AA09688@grue.sware.com.sware.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lab.ultra.nyu.edu Date: 1995-02-07T10:49:05+00:00 List-Id: In article <9502031233.AA09688@grue.sware.com.sware.com> Dennis Doubleday writes: >LPF has done no such thing. They have simply exercised their right not to >support such a port. To be more precise, the FSF does not "support" (in the usual meaning of that term) *any* software whatsoever. Yes, they set up addresses for reporting bugs and try to develop fixes, but actual *support* for GNU software is provided by commercial organizations. Cygnus is the best known, but see the file SUPPORT in any FSF distribution for a full list. The LPF boycott of Apple had precisely two effects on GCC/GNAT for Mac: 1) The FSF would not distribute such a port, nor allow any of its resources (including the gnu newsgroups and mailing lists) to be used for the effort of such a port. 2) The FSF would not assist in the development of such a port and the LPF encouraged its members to do likewise.