From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fef2a40177b882e8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-06 19:00:59 PST Path: swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 2167A, 498, commercial and mil standards... Date: 6 Feb 1995 20:58:04 -0600 Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services +1 713 684 5969 Message-ID: <3h6njs$o2h@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> References: <3h3277$6r3@felix.seas.gwu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com Date: 1995-02-06T20:58:04-06:00 List-Id: In article <3h3277$6r3@felix.seas.gwu.edu>, Michael Feldman wrote: >OK - let's bring it closer to home and talk about ANSI, IEEE, and ISO, >which make lots of money to support their standards programs by >copyrighting and selling these. A copy of Fortran 90 (the standard, not >a compiler) is around $200. The Ada 95 standard is still available >electronically and (unless I mis-read the traffic on this subject) >it took some negotiation to keep it there. Thinking of the Ada 95 >standard as a microcosmic view of the whole free-electronic >vs. expensive-paper situation will help to crystallize it in your minds. > There's a rather interesting article about it in this month's Communications of the ACM. I wish the authors had taken a bigger hammer at these organizations. IMHO, published standards should be available at printing cost (or free if you print it yourself). Of course, both ANSI and the ISO disagree with me (then again, I'm American, so I don't care about either :-) -- Frustrated with C, C++, Pascal, Fortran? Ada95 _might_ be for you! For all sorts of interesting Ada95 tidbits, run the command: "finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.)