From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,99d4d47ae8700971 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!oleane.net!oleane!hunter.axlog.fr!nobody From: Jean-Pierre Rosen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ridiculous question Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:59:10 +0200 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: <3gmt3g.jqh.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> References: <273ba3a6-142b-4e05-bc12-d576968fa6b6@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: s1.news.oleane.net 1214402379 21760 195.25.228.57 (25 Jun 2008 13:59:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:59:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:870 Date: 2008-06-25T16:59:10+02:00 List-Id: anon a �crit : > If you mean Lisp to Ada. The answer is no. As for Ada to Lisp, the > answer is still no. Most Lisp people are having too much fun playing > with Lisp and trying to improve Lisp to deal with Ada. And Ada people > are doing their thing with Ada. > Long time ago, there was an Ada compiler on a Symbolics machine, which was a Lisp machine. Long, long time ago... -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr