From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,93e601c1ce1d293c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-30 11:32:10 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!gw1.att.com!fnnews.fnal.gov!uwm.edu!news.alpha.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!swiss.ans.net!butch!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!l107353 From: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: DOD-STD-2167a Date: 30 Jan 1995 19:32:10 GMT Organization: Lockheed Fort Worth Company Message-ID: <3gjerq$f4f@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.189.143.19 X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Date: 1995-01-30T19:32:10+00:00 List-Id: CONDIC@PSAVAX.PWFL.COM wrote: : Still, there are the Les Miserables (sp?) style program managers : who can't quite seem to grok that. Hence 498 tried to require : fewer specific methods. I think it's an improvement, but we'd : still be better off if there were a way to "tailor requirements : *in*" rather than having to "tailor requirements *out*" The : latter generally leads to that "blind application of 'the rules'" : syndrome. Actually, on F-22, we put in the SOW the words, "All software will be developed in accordance with the F-22 Software Development Plan." We then tailored in a whole bunch of requirements... -------------------------------------------------------------------- Ken Garlington GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com F-22 Computer Resources Lockheed Fort Worth Co. If LFWC or the F-22 program has any opinions, they aren't telling me.