From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d321b3a6b8bcab2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-29 04:51:56 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Adding in COBOL... Date: 29 Jan 1995 07:51:56 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3gg31c$p5m@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <3etund$hnr@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com> <3frqpg$re5@cronkite.seas.gwu.edu> <3g655n$q5k@theopolis.orl.mmc.com> <3g9nir$fpl@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3gc5be$frj@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1995-01-29T07:51:56-05:00 List-Id: David Weller says: Easy, Robert: add (1, to=> long_complex_name); Gee, I thought I'd never see the day I could teach Robert something Umm? I think you forgot something David, what is the type of the add procedure. I guess it is a generic, so don't forget to instantiate it, and oh yes, remember to pass the "+" operator to the generic while you are at it (wouldn't want the dread reemergence doing us in), and also remember to inline it (and hope that inlining generic instances works fine and ....