From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,46a589b2041a8e52,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-28 16:02:10 PST
Path: 
 swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!news.mathworks.com!newshost.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: T'Machine_Mantissa et al. not uniquely defined in Ada95?
Date: 28 Jan 1995 17:45:59 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Distribution: net
Message-ID: <3gehf7$hve@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <BROMAN.95Jan26124516@Np.nosc.mil>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-01-28T17:45:59-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Vincent, you can certainly tell the intention of the design team in this
area because the actual value of all these attributes is in the AARM. If
you don't have the AARM, it is worth picking up a copy, it may well answer
your question.