From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,93e601c1ce1d293c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-27 04:42:02 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.redstone.army.mil!news From: helliott@losat.redstone.army.mil (Doc Elliott) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: DOD-STD-2167a Date: Fri, 27 Jan 95 07:42:02 EST Organization: LOSAT Project Office Message-ID: <3gatrn$89q@michp1.redstone.army.mil> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 136.205.36.98 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.9 Date: 1995-01-27T07:42:02-05:00 List-Id: In article , CONDIC@PSAVAX.PWFL.COM says... > Sniperoo >Just because it comes from the government doesn't automatically >make it a bad thing - eh? Anybody else out there think 498 is >O.K.? > I didn't think that 2167A was all that bad! Sure it had flaws, but those flaws only manifested themselves in programs where the standard was blindly and rigidly applied and interpreted by Government managers who didn't understand the software process. This information is worth just what you paid for it. -- Doc Elliott KE4KUZ Internet: helliott@losat.redstone.army.mil packet: ke4kuz@k4ry.#cenal.al.usa.noam The opinions expressed herein are mine, and do not reflect those of my employer or anyone else unless specifically stated as such.