From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93e601c1ce1d293c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-25 14:22:30 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!news.usafa.af.mil!kirk!cwarack
From: cwarack@kirk.usafa.af.mil (Chris Warack <sys mgr>)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: DOD-STD-2167a
Date: 25 Jan 1995 22:22:30 GMT
Organization: USAF Academy, CO
Sender: cwarack@kirk (Chris Warack <sys mgr>)
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3g6iv6$m0@usafa2.usafa.af.mil>
References: <3g17bj$m13@michp1.redstone.army.mil>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kirk.usafa.af.mil
Date: 1995-01-25T22:22:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In the AF anyway, the word is that 498 is good for the next two years at
which time a commercial standard must be used (read as 498 packaged as
a commercial standard).  This was justified by the dearth of commercial
standards adequate in that area.

In article <3g17bj$m13@michp1.redstone.army.mil>, helliott@losat.redstone.army.mil (Doc Elliott) writes:
|> In article <3g0i9d$6hj@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com>, 
|> l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com says...
|> >
|> 
|> deletia
|> 
|> >Beware! There is not an _official_ replacement for any of these 
|> >standards, yet!  MIL-STD-SDD was _intended_ to replace these, but was 
|> >sidetracked by the Perry memo. There is now an effort to make 
|> >MIL-STD-SDD a commercial standard, at which time it _may_ replace the 
|> >current standards.
|> >
|> >: -- David O'Brien      (dobrien@seas.gwu.edu)
|> >
|> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
|> >Ken Garlington                  GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com
|> 
|> The following was copied off the front of the document referenced.  Have 
|> we been had by a hoax?  Does anyone have a definitive answer?
|> 
|>                              NOT MEASUREMENT
|>                                 SENSITIVE
|>                                     
|>                                     
|>                                 MIL-STD-498
|>                               5 December 1994
|>                              _________________
|>                                                                 
|> Superseding                                                              
|> DOD-STD-2167A
|> 29 February 1988
|>                                                               
|> DOD-STD-7935A
|> 31 October 1988
|>                                                            
|> DOD-STD-1703(NS)
|> 12 February 1987
|> 
|> 
|>                              MILITARY STANDARD
|> 
|> 
|>                           SOFTWARE  DEVELOPMENT
|>                                     
|>                            AND  DOCUMENTATION
|>                                     
|> AMSC NO. N7069                         AREA:  IPSC/MCCR
|> 
|> DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A.  Approved for public release; distribution is 
|> unlimited. 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> Doc Elliott
|> KE4KUZ
|> Internet: helliott@losat.redstone.army.mil
|> packet: ke4kuz@k4ry.#cenal.al.usa.noam
|> The opinions expressed herein are mine, and do not
|> reflect those of my employer or anyone else unless
|> specifically stated as such.
|> 

-- 
Christopher A. Warack, Capt, USAF
Computer Science Department, US Air Force Academy

cwarack@kirk.usafa.af.mil                (719) 472-2401