From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93e601c1ce1d293c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-24 09:31:30 PST
Path: 
 pad-thai.cam.ov.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!udel!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!butch!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!l107353
From: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: DOD-STD-2167a
Date: 24 Jan 1995 16:42:10 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Fort Worth Company
Message-ID: <3g3al2$hrq@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com>
References: <3g17bj$m13@michp1.redstone.army.mil>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.189.143.19
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: 1995-01-24T16:42:10+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Doc Elliott (helliott@losat.redstone.army.mil) wrote:
: The following was copied off the front of the document referenced.  Have 
: we been had by a hoax?  Does anyone have a definitive answer?

Oops! My bad. MIL-STD-498 _did_ get approved for a two-year interim period
(for any new projects started during that time) while it gets developed into
a commercial standard. Sorry about that...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Garlington                  GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com
F-22 Computer Resources         Lockheed Fort Worth Co.

If LFWC or the F-22 program has any opinions, they aren't telling me.