From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6844bd29eefb033e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-23 07:42:22 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!gw1.att.com!csn!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!butch!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!l107353
From: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Multiple instances of run-time sys?
Date: 23 Jan 1995 15:42:22 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Fort Worth Company
Message-ID: <3g0iou$6hj@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com>
References: <3fo5k4$su2@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.189.143.19
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: 1995-01-23T15:42:22+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

We have a "modular" processing architecture on the F-22, although the
definition of modular is a little different than yours. Rather than having
a series of "black boxes" dedicated to different tasks (a radar box, a
mission management box, etc.) we have a series of common modules used for
different tasks (a standard data processor, a signal processor, etc.). The
way we handle the RTS problem is to require a common development environment
for each module type. The RTS for that environment allows multiple programs
to run on the same module, so there's no problem with conflicting RTSs.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Garlington                  GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com
F-22 Computer Resources         Lockheed Fort Worth Co.

If LFWC or the F-22 program has any opinions, they aren't telling me.