From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e12ca1eee1236db X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-20 21:31:50 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!udel!gatech!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA-9x done? Any good PC compilers? Date: 21 Jan 1995 00:31:50 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3fq686$l9m@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <1995Jan11.154250@clstac> <3f49k3$kfp@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3f614s$5ie@news.ycc.yale.edu> <3f9m5u$rc8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3fk7j7$ld5@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1995-01-21T00:31:50-05:00 List-Id: Robert Eachus is wrong in thinking System.Tick has anything to do with delays in Ada 83 (I guess he missed the ARG meeting where we discussed this :-)