From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8782a3b5b8a71471 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-20 08:58:11 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!udel!gatech!swrinde!pipex!uunet!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: pragma import problem ( also OS/2 : gnat 4emx ) Date: 20 Jan 1995 11:58:11 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3foq33$9mc@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <3flfot$1ac9@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1995-01-20T11:58:11-05:00 List-Id: Regarding the use of link name (incidentally I did send a direct message already, so if it didn't arrive, must be an email addressing problem). Generally NEVER use link name, use external name instead, and use for the external name the name as it appears in the external language. This is much more portable. If you use link name, then you have to know system dependent things like whether an underscore is prefixed. Note: there has been some glitch in the OS/2 version in this area in the past, but you should still use external name. Anyway, this will clean up in the EMX vesion we are hopeing to distribute soon.