From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b0f15e208eb5d0ff
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-21 21:10:53 PST
Path: 
 pad-thai.cam.ov.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!apollo.hp.com!lf.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!news.dtc.hp.com!col.hp.com!csn!ncar!gatech!swrinde!pipex!uunet!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Math Lib. for Ada? Ada for X11R6?
Date: 20 Jan 1995 00:27:51 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3fnhkn$4nf@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <3fcf8f$dm6@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <3fjuvh$rrc@network.ucsd.edu>
Date: 1995-01-20T00:27:51-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"It [interfacing Fortran] gets much harder when you have to deal with
 packages that take Fortran routines for callbacks."

At least in GNAT, and I would hope in all Ada 95 compilers, there is
no trouble in passing Fortran routines for callbacks, or indeed passing
routines written in Ada (with pragma Convention Fortran) for this purpose.