From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,17e9efb0492e0d7b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-18 15:22:19 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!wizard.pn.com!satisfied.elf.com!news.mathworks.com!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Large Integers?
Date: 18 Jan 1995 18:22:19 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3fk7rb$mhb@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: 
 <SPIEGEL.95Jan10115602@berlin.bruessel.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <SPIEGEL.95Jan11111040@berlin.bruessel.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <3fhjr1$4h8@rational.rational.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-01-18T18:22:19-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Kent, do you know which compilers supported 64-bit integers, it is my
impression that yes indeed, it is true that very few 83 compilers have
such support. Of course no quarrel with your observation that this is not
a REQUIRED limitation.