From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e12ca1eee1236db
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-18 15:17:58 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!wizard.pn.com!satisfied.elf.com!news.mathworks.com!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ADA-9x done? Any good PC compilers?
Date: 18 Jan 1995 18:17:58 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3fk7j7$ld5@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <1995Jan11.154250@clstac> <3f49k3$kfp@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
 	<3f614s$5ie@news.ycc.yale.edu> <3f9m5u$rc8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
 <EACHUS.95Jan17120531@spectre.mitre.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-01-18T18:17:58-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I was talking about when a delay expires, this has nothing to do with the
required preemption by a higher priority task!
(responding to Eachus' note on my note about infinite delays)