From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f941a4f4283a000c
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interesting and possible buggy behavior in GNAT regarding Annex E
 pragmas.
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <3fce7a87-c0a0-4417-b48d-3f0cd67db662@z13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
References: <c188806d-3a53-4b6b-a364-0e23ef083981@14g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
 <87r57m8ra1.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.230.151.194
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1307403806 22058 127.0.0.1 (6 Jun 2011 23:43:26
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:43:26 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.230.151.194;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
 rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19656
Date: 2011-06-06T16:43:26-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On May 25, 3:21=A0pm, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
> Shark8 writes on comp.lang.ada:
>
> > Hi everyone.
> > I was experimenting with partitioning-pragmas trying to decide on a
> > good way to set up my PostScript interpreter so that the parser could
> > be a remote object possibly servicing multiple clients and I came
> > across a possible bug that is bothering me. In certain instances using
> > one of the pragmas will cause the compiler to error-out, as is
> > expected, but in other cases the compiler does not error out.
>
> > The only way I can see this happening is if, by WITH-ing these
> > children units, the parent units are LIMITED WITH-ed; but that is
> > counter-intuitive and does not allow for USES (which still compile) of
> > the parent unit.
>
> > I have reduced things to the minimal compilable example and the source
> > is as follows:
>
> I've been able to reproduce this with gnat-4.4 (=3D4.4.6-1) on Debian
> unstable. =A0This looks like a genuine bug to me; please report it onhttp=
://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/. =A0What version of GNAT are you using?
>
> --
> Ludovic Brenta.

I'm using 4.4