From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.99.170.14 with SMTP id e14mr151639pgf.147.1506492424199; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 23:07:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.61.196 with SMTP id l62mr5442otc.17.1506492424152; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 23:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feed.usenet.farm!feeder4.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!o200no827225itg.0!news-out.google.com!194ni1413itf.0!nntp.google.com!o200no829553itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 23:07:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.166.230.191; posting-account=bPTmZAoAAAC_6HP9XLKB9aAAxBa6BuOR NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.166.230.191 References: <3ca74d75-f942-4e06-a389-cddb77ec244f@googlegroups.com> <4e590963-d6dd-4d83-a0e7-5b4821740e50@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3fbe9ec6-d773-48b0-9b40-cb457d48009a@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: My first test of github: cpros - lightweight Ada command processor From: reinert Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 06:07:04 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48237 Date: 2017-09-26T23:07:03-07:00 List-Id: Working on it :-) Included "cpros_info.txt" as a start. For me this is for learning to be clever on publishing software. And I need to do it as fast. I am used to publish in scientific journals - but I am novice on publishing software :-) Never done it before. reinert On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 6:25:15 PM UTC+2, AdaMagica wrote: > Am Montag, 25. September 2017 20:34:51 UTC+2 schrieb reinert: > > By the way: I made some cosmetic modifications wrt readability (to please the audience). > > That's the wrong attitude - we do not want to be pleased... > > All we strive for is good software engineering practices with well documented code and telling identifiers. > > Do you really think Split_String (former Rsplit) has considerably improved?