From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1bf3bcdb5f9863
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-13 18:35:42 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail
From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT NT & Ada.Direct_IO
Date: 13 Jan 1995 20:35:42 -0600
Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services   +1 713 684 5969
Message-ID: <3f7d9u$3up@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
References: <INFO-ADA%95011309481537@VM1.NODAK.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com
Date: 1995-01-13T20:35:42-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

This entire conversation sounds like a plea for somebody to write a
GNAT-FAQ.

Also, IMHO, there is NOTHING wrong with having the last line of a
GNAT error report (just after the ubiquitous "Compilation abandoned")
say:

Problems?  Bug reports and pleas for help to: gnat-report@cs.nyu.edu

Just my $0.02 -- now back to my struggle with GNAT...

-- 
       Frustrated with C/C++, Pascal, Fortran?  Ada95 _might_ be for you!
	  For all sorts of interesting Ada95 tidbits, run the command:
"finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.)