From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e12ca1eee1236db
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-13 06:02:04 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!news.Stanford.EDU!unix.sri.com!hsdndev!admii!cmcl2!yale.edu!news.ycc.yale.edu!news
From: Howard.Gilbert@yale.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ADA-9x done? Any good PC compilers?
Date: 13 Jan 1995 14:02:04 GMT
Organization: Yale University
Message-ID: <3f614s$5ie@news.ycc.yale.edu>
References: <1995Jan11.154250@clstac> <3f49k3$kfp@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
Reply-To: Howard.Gilbert@yale.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: gilbert.ycc.yale.edu
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.09
Date: 1995-01-13T14:02:04+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In <3f49k3$kfp@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>
>Actually it was not technically a bug, since compilers are allowed to
>take longer than the minimum for a delay, if you had waited 25,000 years,
>the delay would have expired :-) :-)

Now you are beginning to sound like Microsoft.