From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6570fee5e7c7a796
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-12 06:20:50 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!news.mathworks.com!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: "No" Ada jobs in the Boston area
Date: 12 Jan 1995 09:20:50 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3f3ds2$5b0@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <D27nCB.19r@tigger.jvnc.net> <3f12uq$ef1@rational.rational.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-01-12T09:20:50-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Kent, I think your position is perfectly reasonable, and I have always
supported the idea that diversification by Ada companies helps rather
than hurts Ada.

Still, you don't have to be Greg Aharonian to be a little disappointed when
Rational works so hard to hide its Ada connections at trade shows. FOr
example, at the Object Expo in New York last summer, Rational had a huge
booth with absolutely no mention of Ada anywhere at all.

That's carrying things a little far I think ...