From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,27e56580ae0c3b7d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-24 08:56:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.abs.net!ash.uu.net!lore.csc.com!baen1673807.greenlnk.net!baen1673807!not-for-mail From: chris.m.moore@amsjv.com (Chris M. Moore) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT for Debian Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:54:36 GMT Organization: Alenia Marconi Systems Message-ID: <3f1ffea7.115337085@news.greenlnk.net> References: <404ee0af.0307211056.15324da@posting.google.com> <20030722021229.15da08ae.david@realityrift.com> <20030722135518.32888aaa.david@realityrift.com> <20030722165245.15f880a2.david@realityrift.com> <20030723125549.1336a07f.david@realityrift.com> <20030723134949.7badd43c.david@realityrift.com> <3f1f9c07.90089321@news.greenlnk.net> <3f1fc2d7.100025238@news.greenlnk.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.44.240.2 X-Trace: lore.csc.com 1059062123 6985 20.44.240.2 (24 Jul 2003 15:55:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.csc.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:55:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.8.4.213 X-Original-Trace: 24 Jul 2003 16:52:39 +0100, 10.8.4.213 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40767 Date: 2003-07-24T15:54:36+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:47:23 +0000 (UTC), Preben Randhol wrote: >Chris M. Moore wrote: >> But this script provides gnatgcc, gnatmake etc. /usr/bin/gnatgcc and >> /usr/bin/gnatmake would both be symbolic links to the gnatfe script. >> This script magically transforms gnatgcc to gcc and gnatmake to >> gnatmake but using the versions in the alternate directory. > >So? > >> Surely it's better to do this outside of gnat rather than doing a >> global edit on the source. > >Why? It seems cleaner, less work and more maintainable to build gnat as intended and then to front-end the compiler than to PATCH the source/Makefiles to generate gnatgcc executables. But if you want to do it the hard way then I won't refuse to use your package. ;-) I did look at this not long ago but I abandoned my attempt to port 3.14 PATCHes to 3.15 for this very reason. It just seemed harder than it should be. -- Chris M. Moore Software engineer speaking for myself