From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,169758d7f087ac5b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-09 08:13:41 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!udel!news.mathworks.com!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: comar@cs.nyu.edu (Cyrille Comar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++ Envy
Date: 9 Jan 1995 11:13:41 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3ernbl$r81@lang8.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <3eju61$3kn@nic.umass.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lang8.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-01-09T11:13:41-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

yang@twain.ucs.umass.edu (Huayong YANG) writes:
: 
: Tell me how the above trick compromises the following class:
: 
: class T
: {
:   int an_item;
: public:
:   int another;
: };
: 
: The data member an_item stays private, it seems to me.
: 

what about using the proposed trick to redefine 'class' to be
'struct'. In which case, 'an_item' will become public, no?
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cyrille Comar,                                  E-mail: comar@cs.nyu.edu
Gnat Project                                    US phone: (212) 998-3489