From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 02:42:39 PST From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED4A94C.2020501@noplace.com> <3ed4c9a2@news.wineasy.se> <3ED4EB4E.6050108@cogeco.ca> <3ED63B23.5040308@cogeco.ca> Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X (Ada.Sockets) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: pc1.akermar.com Message-ID: <3ed7278b@news.wineasy.se> X-Original-Trace: 30 May 2003 10:42:35 +0100, pc1.akermar.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@songnetworks.se NNTP-Posting-Host: news.wineasy.se X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: news.wineasy.se Date: 30 May 2003 10:42:35 +0100 X-Trace: wineasy!newsfeed.wineasy.se!news.sto.telegate.se 1054287755 news.wineasy.se (30 May 2003 10:42:35 +0100) X-Complaints-To: abuse@songnetworks.se Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!rip!news.webusenet.com!news.stupi.se!news.stupi.se!wineasy!newsfeed.wineasy.se!news.sto.telegate.se!news.wineasy.se!not-for-mail Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38062 Date: 2003-05-30T10:42:35+01:00 List-Id: Warren W. Gay wrote: > I am not saying it shouldn't be done, but I think you've overly > trivialized it. 8-) No I haven't. I have made something 99,95 percent of Ada ordinary users could use. Successfully.The issues you raise complicates matters and creates confusion. It is the stuff you put in a specialized library. It is NOT something for the unwashed masses. PLEASE read "The Inmates Are Running The Asylum". Less is more! Focus on something to do well. > I think most people would settle for a good TCP > level API for applications. But this would need to include naming > services at a minimum, and ideally Ada streams with > endian neutral I/O to be truly useful. That is extras! > It would also be useful for Ada0X to include some extensions to the > distributed annex to consider standard ways to authenticate. This is > perhaps one of the biggest thorn patches for distributed computing in > hostile environments. I would love to see SSL (perhaps) as a builtin > selectable option for the channel filter for example. I would not mind having that, but it is still extras. greetings,