From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3644f8ac64ffdc48 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-23 09:14:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!nntp.theplanet.net!inewsm1.nntp.theplanet.net!195.40.4.120.MISMATCH!easynet-quince!easynet.net!feed1.news.be.easynet.net!sisyphus.news.be.easynet.net!not-for-mail From: "Carole Devillers" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3eca0ae2$0$6533$afc38c87@sisyphus.news.be.easynet.net> Subject: Re: XML parsing solution for Ada Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 18:11:14 +0200 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Message-ID: <3ece48a2$0$6529$afc38c87@sisyphus.news.be.easynet.net> Organization: [ posted via Easynet Belgium ] NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 May 2003 16:13:22 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.100.174.165 X-Trace: 1053706402 6529 [::ffff:212.100.174.165]:22514 X-Complaints-To: abuse@be.easynet.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37699 Date: 2003-05-23T16:13:22+00:00 List-Id: Hi, Sorry for the delay I am not living here 24 hours a day. Here are the answers to your questions: 1) authentication, verification, validation,... XMLBooster produces naturally validating parsers, far beyond the validation possibilities of DTD's 2) Is there also a MacOSX version available? XMLBooster runs natively on Windows, and is portable on virtually any other platform, as we can deliver the software in a shrouded C source form, to be recompiled on your specific platform. You can try the free evaluation version to give you an idea of what it can do for you. Other questions are welcome... Cheers, Carole "Preben Randhol" wrote in message news:slrnbcs88i.5hu.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no... > Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > > Preben Randhol wrote: > > > >>Perhaps I used the wrong word, is it called verification? > > > > You probably meant "validation", didn't you? > > Ah yes, sorry. > > -- > Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/