From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1ebfe7f8f5e385d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-01 02:06:36 PST Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 11:06:28 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Um9kcmlnbyBHYXJjw61h?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Generic formal access types References: <3eb01630@epflnews.epfl.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: lglpc31.epfl.ch Message-ID: <3eb0e397@epflnews.epfl.ch> X-Trace: epflnews.epfl.ch 1051779991 128.178.76.8 (1 May 2003 11:06:31 +0200) Organization: EPFL Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!news.mailgate.org!news-zh.switch.ch!epflnews.epfl.ch!not-for-mail Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36796 Date: 2003-05-01T11:06:28+02:00 List-Id: That seems a nice workaround, although I still have to pass two parameters during instantiation. I will give it a try! Thanks, Rodrigo Chad R. Meiners wrote: How about generic type Access_Type is private; Null_Value : Access_Type; -CRM