From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,704b8962c968e4b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-01 00:30:47 PST
From: "Frank" <franjoe@frisurf.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <3e87f119$1@news.wineasy.se>
 <1ec946d1.0303310759.5c6babbb@posting.google.com>
Subject: Re: new/free of abstract types
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.225.111.73
Message-ID: <3e894e2b$1@news.wineasy.se>
X-Original-Trace: 1 Apr 2003 09:30:35 +0100, 213.225.111.73
X-Complaints-To: abuse@songnetworks.se
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.wineasy.se
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: news.wineasy.se
Date: 1 Apr 2003 09:30:37 +0100
X-Trace: wineasy!newsfeed.wineasy.se!news.sto.telegate.se 1049185837
 news.wineasy.se (1 Apr 2003 09:30:37 +0100)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@songnetworks.se
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.algonet.se!algonet!news.stupi.se!news.stupi.se!wineasy!newsfeed.wineasy.se!news.sto.telegate.se!news.wineasy.se!not-for-mail
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35849
Date: 2003-04-01T09:30:37+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>
> Let me know if any of this isn't clear.  You asked an important
> question, and it touches upon aspects of the language with which many
> programmers aren't familiar.

Hi!
Thank you for help. This is what I "deduced" from Norman Cohens book also
:-)
It is just that it looks as if I want to initialise the new object with the
values from the parameter one.

As you may notice I have the parameter as "out" mode. This prototyping gives
me the impression that someting is sent in to
the subprogram still (tag perhaps?). Is it a problem for me to use only
"out" in this parameter or should I use "in out"?


Frank