From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,57ca86d2263c2ca9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-30 19:20:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!colt.net!peernews3.colt.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:19:29 +0500 References: <3e379038$0$350$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) Subject: Re: Gnat: system__finalization_implementation__finalize_list Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/ Message-ID: <3e39eb8c$0$351$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Jan 2003 03:20:44 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13 X-Trace: 1043983244 news.gradwell.net 351 mail2news/195.149.39.13 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33628 Date: 2003-01-31T03:20:44+00:00 List-Id: In article , Simon Wright writes: > porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes: > >> Ideas what this means, how to find the error? >> (All checks are turned on!) >> >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> 0x40164c96 in system__finalization_implementation__finalize_list () from /usr/lib/libgnat-3.14p.so.1 >> >> This error appears after exiting my main rountine (well, the main >> rountine is not a procedure but a begin...end block of a package >> body.) > > As a matter of interest, do you have any unbounded strings? GNAT has > been known to have occasional wobblies with these in obscure > circumstances. They are controlled, so are involved with finalization, > hence the thought. Seemingly not, by I use somehow similar types (sequences of elements representing characters). Well, every character is a controlled object and the sequence contains a pointer to it.