From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9c1962801ad6b73 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-22 14:08:36 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!nntp.theplanet.net!inewsm1.nntp.theplanet.net!zen.net.uk!195.149.39.56.MISMATCH!news-peer-lilac.gradwell.net!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:21:15 +0500 References: Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) Subject: Re: Fussy Standard: what is modulo Address? Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/ Message-ID: <3e2f1663$0$33931$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Jan 2003 22:08:35 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13 X-Trace: 1043273315 news.gradwell.net 33931 mail2news/195.149.39.13 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33357 Date: 2003-01-22T22:08:35+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff writes: > "Grein, Christoph" writes: > >> > 13.3.22-23. "For a prefix X that denotes a subtype or object: >> > X'Alignment... Address modulo the Alignment". >> > >> > The Standard seems to not explain what is "Address modulo". >> > >> > It can be: >> > >> > 1. The integer mathematical operation fpr >> > System.Storage_Element.Integer_Address. >> > >> > 2. Operation "mod" for System.Address, defined also in System. >> > >> > Moreover the Standard probably does not say anything about relations of >> > these two operations (they should be the same as people seem to tend to >> > naturally consider these the same). >> > >> > We should correct it, yes? >> >> You seem to have point here. Report it to ada-comment@ada-auth.org. > > I don't think so. "Modulo" means the "mod" operator for > System.Address. This is defined in 13.7.1(8). The AARM states this > explicitly in 13.3(24.b) and 13.7.1(11.b). So, it is stated nly in AARM, not in ARM? It is a bug. > The manual does not define the semantics of this "mod" operator. How > could it? Address is just a private type provided by the implementer -- > it could be anything. The manual should define relations between System.Address and System.Storage_Element.Integer_Address. To define these seems being just forgotten. No these relations which should be true accordingly human intuition may have bad impact on reliability.