From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,19e4a2b12c5b43fa
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-22 14:08:35 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:29:16 +0500
References: <mailman.11.1043222919.4961.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com)
Subject: Re: Intermixing two storage pools
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/
Message-ID: <3e2f1662$0$33931$bed64819@news.gradwell.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Jan 2003 22:08:34 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13
X-Trace: 1043273314 news.gradwell.net 33931 mail2news/195.149.39.13
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33356
Date: 2003-01-22T22:08:34+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <wcciswh2kkx.fsf@shell01.theworld.com>,
	Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> writes:
> porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes:
> 
>> Are you sure, which item of Standard deprecates this?
> 
> 13.11.2(16).  How could it be otherwise?

I meant the case when two pool variables share the same memory (e.g. 
one pool uses other for allocation).

Well, I realize that eliminating this restriction would have bad impact 
on memory debuggers.