From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,19e4a2b12c5b43fa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-22 02:22:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!nntp.theplanet.net!inewsm1.nntp.theplanet.net!zen.net.uk!news.cabal.org.uk!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:42:05 +0500 References: Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) Subject: Re: Intermixing two storage pools Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/ Message-ID: <3e2e70fb$0$33928$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Jan 2003 10:22:51 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13 X-Trace: 1043230971 news.gradwell.net 33928 mail2news/195.149.39.13 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33338 Date: 2003-01-22T10:22:51+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Grein, Christoph" writes: >> I have to user-defined storage pools. >> >> Is it OK to allocate ("new") by one of them and deallocate by the other >> ("Uncheked_Deallocation"), using conversions between access types. > > No, as far as I know that's even erroneous. You must deallocated from the same > pool you allocated it. Are you sure, which item of Standard deprecates this?