From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,19e4a2b12c5b43fa,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-21 23:43:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!proxad.net!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!zen.net.uk!news.cabal.org.uk!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:42:51 +0500
Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com)
Subject: Intermixing two storage pools
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/
Message-ID: <3e2e4b85$0$33929$bed64819@news.gradwell.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Jan 2003 07:43:01 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13
X-Trace: 1043221381 news.gradwell.net 33929 mail2news/195.149.39.13
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33335
Date: 2003-01-22T07:43:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have to user-defined storage pools.

Is it OK to allocate ("new") by one of them and deallocate by the other 
("Uncheked_Deallocation"), using conversions between access types.