From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f0972757f30880f7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-13 05:51:55 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: john@nospam.demon.co.uk (John McCabe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Sockets - newbie at a brick wall
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:52:35 GMT
Message-ID: <3df9e3d4.11264567@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <fbedb3ef.0212111040.3063ee31@posting.google.com>
 <x7vsmx2m9y2.fsf@galadriel.frlngtn.gecm.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1039787514 19352 158.152.226.81 (13 Dec 2002
 13:51:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:51:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31786
Date: 2002-12-13T13:52:35+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 13 Dec 2002 11:31:49 +0000, Simon Wright <simon.j.wright@amsjv.com>
wrote:

>You don't show any calls to GNAT.Sockets.Initialize. We found that
>leaving out this call made no (apparent) difference on Linux, but that
>it was necessary on Windows. No experience with MacOS!

My updates to Ben's original shows these, although I'm not 100% sure
that I've set the Process_Blocking_IO parameter correctly. Actually,
on Windows, Initialize in GNAT.Sockets.Thin doesn't use the
Process_Blocking_IO parameter, all it really does is call WSAStartup. 

Still, it really should be there anyway, as should Finalize really
(I've missed that one out!).


Best Regards
John McCabe

To reply by email replace 'nospam' with 'assen'