From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,229a77b902096176 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-10 14:13:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 03:12:33 +0500 References: Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) Subject: Re: fastest data structure Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/ Message-ID: <3df666ee$0$303$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Dec 2002 22:13:02 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13 X-Trace: 1039558382 news.gradwell.net 303 mail2news/195.149.39.13 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31657 Date: 2002-12-10T22:13:02+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Etienne Baudin" writes: > Hello, > > I'd like to know which of these 2 data structures is the fastest to proceed >: > > an simple array of "My_type" (My type is a record...) > or a liked liste of "My_Type" [skip] > for i in A'range loop > processing A(i) > end loop; > > while (p != null) loop > process p.comp; > p := p.next; > end loop; Depends on CPU and compiler. IMO, the first is faster in most cases (may be in 95% of cases).