From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbd35bb508093bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-26 20:19:27 PST Reply-To: "David C. Hoos, Sr." From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <7823N817@web2news.com> Subject: Re: New Ada compiler for .NET Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 22:19:19 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.227.47.49 Message-ID: <3de447cb$1_1@nopics.sjc> X-Trace: nopics.sjc 1038370763 216.227.47.49 (26 Nov 2002 20:19:23 -0800) Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!telocity-west!DIRECTV!nopics.sjc!not-for-mail Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31242 Date: 2002-11-26T22:19:19-06:00 List-Id: Does the comment "Note that MGNAT must be compiled using GNAT 3.13p" on the A# web page mean that 3.14p and 3.15p will not work, or should it say 3.14p or later? "Martin Carlisle" wrote in message news:7823N817@web2news.com... > We have completed a port of the GNAT compiler to the .NET framework, > which is based on the ACT tool JGNAT. More information and downloads > available from http://www.usafa.af.mil/dfcs/bios/mcc_html/a_sharp.html > > This tool will be presented at SIGAda 2002 in Houston, TX, USA, on 11 > December 2002. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Martin C. Carlisle, PhD > Associate Professor and Advisor-in-Charge > Department of Computer Science > United States Air Force Academy > DISCLAIMER: Opinions contained in this message are those of the author, > and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the US Air Force Academy, > US Air Force, or US Government. > -- > Posted via http://web2news.com the faster web2news on the web