From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,711b9e86dd6927b9,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-13 10:01:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:15:26 +0500 Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) Subject: Charles: missing vector iterators Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/ Message-ID: <3dd29387$0$303$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Nov 2002 18:01:43 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13 X-Trace: 1037210503 news.gradwell.net 303 mail2news/195.149.39.13 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30823 Date: 2002-11-13T18:01:43+00:00 List-Id: Why in Charles.Vectors iterators are missing even despite it is modelled after STL? Iterators are good for many things, including reliability: In enclosed loops: for i in ... loop for j in ... loop ... end loop; end loop; personally I often mess I and J. Probability to mess iterators is lesser than to mess natural number indexes because iterators are more type-safe. Please add these. BTW, may be put Chrles on SourceForge or something that if e.g. I will want to submit a patch it would become simpler?