From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d927b7ea9b65580a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-09 06:10:27 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 17:34:08 +0500
References: <3dccc023$0$304$bed64819@news.gradwell.net>
Subject: Re: Style: always declare subrountines?
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <3dcd1752$0$305$bed64819@news.gradwell.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Nov 2002 14:10:26 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13
X-Trace: 1036851026 news.gradwell.net 305 mail2news/195.149.39.13
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30637
Date: 2002-11-09T14:10:26+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

[Posted and mailed]

In article <mailman.1036840502.30553.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>,
	sk <noname@myob.com> writes:
> Hi, 
> 
>> ... an internal subrountine with the same specification 
>> as a not yet implemented public procedure ...
> 
> The "internal subroutine" IS the implementation of the 
> "public procedure". 
> 
> You will not be permitted, by the compiler to do the 
> following ...

You misunderstood. I'm about the case when one has forgotten
to write the definition of the "public procedure", but
written in the body a "private procedure" with the same
specification.