From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a327d56b3d5e9a4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-08 19:20:45 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 23:05:53 +0500
References: <3dcbb4e4$0$299$bed64819@news.gradwell.net>
Subject: Re: Booch: iterator invalidation
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <3dcc7efc$0$305$bed64819@news.gradwell.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Nov 2002 03:20:28 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13
X-Trace: 1036812028 news.gradwell.net 305 mail2news/195.149.39.13
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30618
Date: 2002-11-09T03:20:28+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <iYOy9.16284$Dc4.56479@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>,
	"Jeffrey Creem" <jeff@thecreems.com> writes:
> "Victor Porton" <porton@ex-code.com> wrote in message
> news:3dcbb4e4$0$299$bed64819@news.gradwell.net...
>> What are conditions when Booch iterators are invalidated?
>> It is missing in the documentation.
>>
> Usually no need to resort to #ifdef preprocessor stuff.. Just make a generic
> formal
> that says error checking enabled. Generic actual parameter is a
> constant/static then any decent compiler will optimize out any of the actual
> checks in the object code and you get the same effect as the #ifdefs without
> the lack of portability.

I suggested #ifdef because as I remeber I've readied somewhere that
modern Ada compilers use code sharing for generics, not repeated
compilation like C++.

What about GNAT in particular?