From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a5467dded7223af X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-07 21:27:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!demon!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:10:57 +0500 References: <3dc7f605$0$303$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> Subject: Re: Building documentation from comments Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <3dcb4b44$0$299$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Nov 2002 05:27:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13 X-Trace: 1036733252 news.gradwell.net 299 mail2news/195.149.39.13 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30569 Date: 2002-11-08T05:27:32+00:00 List-Id: In article , Simon Wright writes: > porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes: > >> P.S. May be the best solution would be if I would find time to >> modify Booch source in such the way that it would become fully >> compatible with AdaBrowse. Is Boch author here? Would you include my >> changes in the next release and continue to follow my policy for >> compatibility with AdaBrowse? > > I guess that depends on how much work it is, for how much gain. At the We just need to develop a simple "standard" of commenting compatible with AdaBrowse and follow it. The main problem with comments in the current Booch is that some of these have empty lines within them, but these should be replaced by "--" lines (with nothing after "--"). Comments also should be a little reordered. It is all.